FedEx CEO Fred Smith disputes New York Times report on company investments

Local Biz

MEMPHIS, Tenn. (localmemphis.com) – FedEx’s founder and CEO fired back at the New York Times after it published a critical article about the Memphis-based company and the Memphis-area’s largest employer.

The article contended FedEx didn’t make enough promised capital investments after Congress passed a tax cut, which the newspaper claimed brought FedEx’s tax rate to less than zero in 2018.

Not only did a company spokesperson say FedEx paid federal income tax every year, Smith himself released a rare, lengthy statement disputing the piece and challenging the New York Times publisher.

“I hereby challenge the publisher of the New York Times & the business section editor to a public debate with me & the FedEx corporate Vice President of Tax,” Smith wrote as part of the statement.

“If Fred Smith made that challenge, he means it and would be more than happy to do it,” Memphis Business Journal Associate Editor Meagan Nichols said.

Nichols covers FedEx extensively and argued the New York Times article on FedEx didn’t capture the full context.

“They talked about all the things they hadn’t done. They didn’t mention all the investments happening,” Nichols said.

On FedEx’s public affairs Twitter account, the company explained recent investments, which included a more than $1.5 billion commitment to the Memphis world hub, $200 million in pay increases, and a new pension contribution for its workers.

A company spokesperson said those factors temporarily lowered the company’s federal income tax, which was the 2017 tax cut law’s intention.

“Always room for improvement, but I think they haven’t taken steps lately that are good for employees,” Nichols said.

“Mr. Smith is right on, he’s telling the exact truth,” University of Memphis economist Dr. John Gnuschke said.

Dr. Gnuschke supports FedEx’s impact on its jobs, and the taxes created from those jobs.

“They are an economic engine, but they are also a tax generation engine,” Dr. Gnuschke said.

The New York Times responded to Fred Smith’s request to debate the New York Times publisher as a colorful response which doesn’t challenge any of the story’s facts.

Smith’s full statement:

“The New York Times published a distorted and factually incorrect story on the front page of the Sunday, November 17 edition concerning FedEx and our billions of dollars of tax payments and billions of dollars of investments in the U.S. economy.  Pertinent to this outrageous distortion of the truth is the fact that unlike FedEx, the New York Times paid zero federal income tax in 2017 on earnings of $111 million, and only $30 million in 2018 – 18% of their pretax book income.  Also in 2018 the New York Times cut their capital investments nearly in half to $57 million, which equates to a rounding error when compared to the $6 billion of capital that FedEx invested in the U.S. economy during that same year.

I hereby challenge A.G. Sulzberger, publisher of the New York Times and the business section editor to a public debate in Washington, DC with me and the FedEx corporate vice president of tax.  The focus of the debate should be federal tax policy and the relative societal benefits of business investments and the enormous intended benefits to the United States economy, especially lower and middle class wage earners.

I look forward to promptly hearing from Mr. Sulzberger and scheduling this open event to bring further public awareness of the facts related to these important issues.”

– Fred Smith, Chairman and CEO of FedEx Corporation

FedEx also sent Local 24 News the following statement:

Response to the New York Times – November 17, 2019 

The New York Times article is a deliberate distortion of our company’s actions before and after tax reform. FedEx has paid federal income tax every year, including fiscal year 2018. Following passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), FedEx invested billions in capital items eligible for accelerated depreciation and made large contributions to our employee pension plans. These factors have temporarily lowered our federal income tax, which was the law’s intention to help grow GDP and generate investment in the U.S. The accelerated depreciation deductions are only temporary with higher depreciation and lower taxes early in the life of a new capital asset. This is then offset by lower depreciation and higher taxes later in that asset’s life. These temporary deductions FedEx received for capital investments are minimal compared to the overall impact the company has on the economy.

FedEx made extensive investments in our team members and our global network to better serve our customers following passage of the TCJA. These investments included a voluntary contribution of $1.5 billion to the FedEx pension plan to ensure it remains a well-funded retirement program, more than $200 million in increased team member compensation – about two-thirds of which went to hourly team members – and more than $3 billion to significantly expand and modernize our Memphis and Indianapolis hubs through 2025.

FedEx takes pride in paying its full share of taxes and has paid almost $10 billion in total taxes in the U.S. during the last five fiscal years, contributing to tax revenues of the U.S. government. We have supported tax increases in some cases, particularly federal diesel and gasoline taxes, to fund badly-needed infrastructure in the United States. The decrease in U.S. investment over the past year is due to the slowdown in global trade which has a significant impact on the asset-intensive industrial economy, including FedEx.

– FedEx

©TEGNA Inc. 2019. All Rights Reserved.

What's Trending Now

Don't Miss

More Don't Miss

Event Calendar